THE BOOK OF ACTS
Lesson 28, Chapter 12
We just barely got into Acts chapter 12 last week, and the first thing we see mentioned in the
chapter is that Herod Agrippa is now the King of Judah. The chapter will end with his death.
His grandfather Herod the Great was the first Herod to rule, but his death just after Christ was
born ended the rule of kings over Judah for 40 years until Agrippa was put into power by the
newly coronated Roman Emperor Claudius. In between Herod the Great and Herod Agrippa,
Roman procurators governed the Holy Land.
This is a good time to also recall that the so-called Jewish Kings Herod the Great and Agrippa
were not Jews, even though they called themselves such. They were of Idumean (Edomite)
stock on Herod’s father’s side, and Nabatean stock (that is, descendants of Ishmael) on
Herod’s mother’s side. The Jews mocked Herod the Great for his claim of Jewishness, yet
they accepted Agrippa’s probably because he seemed to genuinely follow Judaism. It is
interesting that to this day, adhering to the religion of Judaism is the primary test for
determining whether a person is a Jew or not. Ethnicity is often secondary.
Let’s re-read this chapter in its entirety since we only made it to verse 3 last time.
RE-READ ACTS CHAPTER 12 all
Verse 3 identifies the group who was pleased that James had been executed and Peter had
been arrested by Agrippa as Ioudaious. This Greek Word can mean two different, but related,
things. It can mean Jews, as Jews in general; or it can indicate Judeans more specifically.
Judeans are Jews who reside in the Holy Land province of Roman controlled Judea.
Sometimes the setting and the issue tells us which of these meanings is intended; other times
it is nearly impossible to know. The scene in verse 3 takes place in Jerusalem of Judea, and so
most likely the intent is to say that the Jews of Judea were the ones happy to see what King
Herod Agrippa did to James and Peter. There were more politically sensitive and religiously
motivated people in Judea than in the rest of the Holy Land because Jerusalem was the power
center of Judaism and so these Judean Jews paid more attention to all the latest intrigues and
issues, since the leadership was there to stir up trouble. But those Jews who lived outside of
Judea, in the countryside and in the Diaspora, were more interested in daily life and family.
Essentially, the Judeans were the inside-the-beltway Jews of the Holy Land (NOTE: inside-the-
beltway refers to the political class that resides and/or works in Washington D.C.).
Peter’s arrest occurred during the springtime feast period of Passover, Unleavened Bread and
Firstfruits. Exactly at what point during this series of feasts we don’t know. This means that
Jerusalem would have been crowded beyond measure with thousands and thousands of
Jewish pilgrims coming from all over the Holy Land and the Diaspora. So we’re told that
Agrippa decided it would be best (politically) to wait until after Passover to deal with Peter; that
is, after all the crowds had left for home. I pointed out last week that by now it had become
1 / 8

common practice for Jews in usual everyday speech to refer to the entire sequence of the 3
spring feasts as either Passover or Unleavened Bread (Pesach or Matza). And just like we see
here in verses 3 and 4, the two terms aren’t meant to be precise, but rather as general and
interchangeable, even in the same conversation. Once the crowds left, the only remaining
Jews would be the Jews of Judea, the ones that had more interest in seeing the members of
The Way being punished, and if possible, disbanded due to them not being politically correct
according to the religious doctrines of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.
So Peter is under arrest and in a Roman prison. However the point is made in verse 5 that
intense prayer was being made on his behalf. David Stern makes a wonderful and salient point
about prayer. He says that in the few words of this verse we are taught something invaluable
about the nature of true, meaningful prayer, and the one who prays. He says that 5 points are
made: 1) Prayer should be intense, not casual. That is, you need to be still, focused, and
purposeful rather than repeating mantras and form prayers that often are said without actually
contemplating what it is you’re saying. I am one whose mind will sometimes wander when I
pray silently; so long ago I learned to pray out loud even in private in order to stay focused. 2)
When the verse says prayers were being made, it means prayer was ongoing. Prayer for Peter
wasn’t a one-and-done outburst. I’ve often asked myself if after approaching God with a
specific request, whether it is even right for me to keep repeating that same prayer need as
though God is forgetful. But I think that occasional thought really just reflects my worldly
thinking creeping in because, Old or New Testament, praying continually to God over a specific
matter is not portrayed as needlessly pestering Him; rather it is obeying and submitting to Him.
We are commanded to do so and it is entirely to our benefit. 3) Our prayers are to be directed
to God; not through an intermediary. Otherwise our relationship is not with Him, it is with
another. And He has stretched out His hand to all who trust Him and offered us to come and
stand before the throne of Grace and speak directly to Him, and hear directly from Him. 4)
Prayer was made to God on Peter’s behalf. That is, the prayer was not general; it was specific
concerning Peter’s precise difficulties. I have often said that I really don’t want to see the
words “unspoken prayer” on our Prayer List. An unspoken prayer will be an unheard prayer,
and thus an unanswered prayer. It goes against every Biblical principle to essentially pray
nothing. If it is too intimate to share, then don’t; keep it between yourself and the Lord. But
often it is simply an issue of pride or fear of embarrassment that keeps us from being specific,
as we ask others to join us in prayer. Read the Psalms as David is open and honest (even
highly emotional) about his predicaments (sometimes self induced), and how he feels about it
all. It is a good model for us. 5) The community of Believers prayed for Peter. If we are truly
going to be a community of Believers then we need to share our joys as well as our concerns.
We are to rally around one another especially in the hour of need. We are not called to
isolation. And we aren’t called to be only concerned about our own needs. This is why I both
ask you to put your needs and the needs of others on our Prayer List and to be as specific as
possible. But also that when you receive the Prayer List that you take the time to pray for each
request individually.
CJB
James 5:16 Therefore, openly acknowledge your sins to one another, and pray for
each other, so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and
effective.
2 / 8

What follows in the next few verses is the result of the intense prayer made to God on Peter’s
behalf. The Passover week of festivals was over, Jerusalem now more or less back to normal,
and this is when Agrippa planned to deal with Peter, no doubt intending to kill him. We don’t
know exactly in which of the several prisons in Jerusalem Peter was being detained, so I’ll not
speculate. What we are directly told, however, is that Peter was guarded so closely that two
Roman soldiers were literally chained to Peter even inside his cell. And there were more
soldiers stationed at the entrance to the prison. Peter was asleep, between the two sleeping
Roman soldiers he was chained to, when suddenly an angel appeared before him. It says that
a light shown in his cell; angels are almost always accompanied with light.
We are told that the angel literally tapped Peter’s side to awaken him. It’s not unusual for an
angel to make physical contact with a human being as when Jacob wrestled with an angel who
tapped Jacob’s hip and dislocated it to end the struggle. The angel issued instructions for
Peter to hurry up, get dressed, throw on his robe and to follow him. It is clear that Peter, still
foggy from sleeping, wasn’t at all sure what was happening or who was breaking him out of
prison, or even if it was actually happening. But somehow the chains fell off of his wrists and in
all the commotion the guards that lay next to him remained soundly asleep. Peter thought he
was dreaming. But as the minutes passed, and as Peter led by the angel walked right by the 2
guards stationed at the prison entrance, he began to suspect that this was for real.
We’re told that they finally arrived at the Iron Gate leading to the city. Which gate is often
asked, but since we don’t know the location of the prison, we can’t ascertain which city gate is
being described. Yet Luke’s description likely means that in Peter’s day both the location of
the prison and of the specific iron gate were so well known that there was no need to say any
more. Let me pause just a moment to remind us all that when the writers of the New
Testament wrote, they weren’t thinking in terms of speaking to readers far into the future, and
especially not thinking about communicating to gentiles (the exceptions being, in some cases,
John and his Book of Revelation and Paul in some passages in his letters). These current
events were generally being recorded for the use of people in the Jewish culture in
contemporary times. While the Torah was written specifically for the purpose of future
generations having God’s instructions at hand (as is stated in the Torah itself), no such claim
is made by the authors of the books of the New Testament. So sometimes places and
locations that are mentioned are difficult if not impossible to pin down, and descriptions that
we’d love to have can be very sparse.
The Iron Gate opened by itself, no doubt meaning that it was locked. It was customary that city
gates were locked once the sun went down to help keep the city residents safe from robbers
and marauders during the night. The angel continued to lead Peter down one street, and out of
danger, when suddenly he disappeared. That is when Peter knew for sure that this was God in
action.
Sort of buried in this narrative is a conundrum: why did God save Peter but let James die at the
hand of Herod Agrippa? This is the sort of thing that, if we’ve lived long enough, something of
this nature has happened in our lives and we’ve wrestled with such a question. My father
fought in WWII, and when I could get him to even speak about it (which was rare and mostly
towards the end of his life), it was usually about some dire situation in which for some
3 / 8

inexplicable reason he survived, but many others around him did not. There seemed to be no
pattern, no rhyme nor reason for who was saved and who wasn’t. It was clear that he was
troubled by this, no doubt feeling guilty to be alive as others were dying around him. This is
mostly the reason he didn’t want to talk about it. Why, he asked? Why did he make it and
others perished? They were no less valuable than he; and he was no better than them. Was it
pure serendipity? Wrong place, wrong time? One foot to left, you live. One foot to the right, you
die. Or was God in control and choosing this one to live and that one to die? I think it is easier
for us to sit in the safety of our sanctuary or our home and say confidently to ourselves that
“God is in control”. But when it is happening to you, and as you look back, I suspect that the
experience alters how one thinks about it. For my father, a devout Christian man, he had no
answers; only gratitude and at times deep sadness, which would well up in him even 50 years
after the horrific events. He told me that as the war ended he became determined to be a good
man, and to live a good life, because that was his duty now that for whatever reason, the Lord
spared him. So I have no good answers for you as to why God chose to rescue Peter by
means of an audacious, supernatural rescue mission, but stood by and allowed James to be
wrongly convicted and executed. And this is where faith plays the biggest role in our lives as
worshippers of the God of the Bible. It is when something happens and nothing seems
obvious, or even logical, as to the how and why; and there is nothing left but to believe that
either God oversees everything and has reasons beyond our ability to comprehend, or
everything is mostly just due to the luck of the draw. One way allows for realization of hope in
the mercy of our Creator; the other way leads only to despair and fear at the unpredictable
turns of fate.
Peter made his way to Miriam’s house; she was the mother of John called Mark. John Mark
was a cousin of the disciple Barnabas. At this time, especially in Jerusalem, the Believers
seemed to meet in homes, at other times in public places, and yet at other times in secret
hideouts depending on the current social and political circumstances. Obviously Miriam’s
house was a known and regular meeting place for the core group of Jerusalem Believers, and
when Peter arrived the group was in the midst of prayer for Peter. No doubt Miriam’s house
was larger than typical in order to be a suitable meeting place. Peter goes up to the house and
knocks on the door and what comes next is almost comical.
Miriam’s house servant, Rhoda, went to the door. Peter was calling to those inside and when
she heard him she instantly recognized his voice. But Rhoda got so excited that she ran from
the door and forgot to let Peter in because she was in such a hurry to tell the others that Peter
was here. They told her she was crazy, but she kept insisting; it seems to never have occurred
to her that all she had to do was go back to the door and open it to prove she was right. Finally
someone said, it’s not Peter it’s his angel. This remark gives me a good opportunity to talk
about how Jews thought about Angels in this era, but also to reveal another pet peeve of mine.
The reality is that as much as Heaven and Angels seem to be hot topics in every age of
Christianity, our present time included, it was also that way among the ancient Jews. And since
the Holy Scriptures are our sole divine source of reliable information about Heaven and
Angels, it is disappointing to find that so little is said about either in the Bible. I can sum up
Heaven by saying it is a spiritual place that resides in another dimension; it is God’s dwelling
place, it is eternal, it is beautiful, sin is not present there, Angels live in Heaven (when they’re
4 / 8

not someplace else), and when a Believer dies, we go there. Outside of that, there’s not much
else divulged. It is the same for Angels. We know they exist, they can appear in human form,
there are different kinds, light is usually involved, and they are sent by God. There are
Archangels who seem to be at the top of a hierarchy of Angel ranks. That is not all, but it is
most of what we’ll learn in the Scriptures about Angels.
Today, it is popular to think that when humans die, we “get our wings” and become angels. Or
that each of us has a guardian angel (or in the case of my wife, she says she has several very
tired ones). But how were angels created? When? How many are there? Are more being
made? Do they exist forever? Are there really different kinds or do they just have different
jobs? What do they do? Are all Angels good Angels? What is a fallen Angel? These questions
and more are common within Christianity and, again, were also of great interest to ancient
Judaism.
The bottom line is that Angelology (the study of Angels), and the resultant doctrines that have
been formed about Angels, are almost entirely the product of the imaginings of the human
mind. And they haven’t evolved that much over the centuries. In fact, I can say that generally
speaking the doctrines of Angels as found in Christian tradition came almost entirely from
ancient Judaism, and much of what Judaism believed came from Persian Angelology. So I
caution you to be careful in just what you believe about Angels, or read about Angels (and
Heaven for that matter) in the many books written on the subject because they consist almost
entirely of doctrines and personal opinions and outright fantasy usually presented as Biblical
fact. But how can a few sentences of Scripture about Heaven or Angels result in 400 page
books? Much is added and leaps of assumption are made and I highly question its real value
other than to distract us from spending time to learn what God has actually revealed to us in
His Word.
Thus when we read of some Believer in the crowd at Miriam’s house comment that it can’t
possibly be Peter at the door, but rather it is his angel, this is not to be taken as new Biblical
information about angels, but rather as what Jews in that era believed as part of their
Halakhah. And the Talmud indicates a belief in Judaism (at least by some Rabbis) of the
existence of personal, guardian angels for each and every Jew. The response of this Believer
about the person knocking at the door who sounds like Peter indicates another tradition that
guardian angels can take on certain characteristics of the human person they are assigned to.
But most of these thoughts about Angels amount to cultural superstition; becoming a Believer
didn’t erase those thoughts.
Finally the startled crowd at Miriam’s house thought to open the door and to their shock there
stood Peter! He raised his hand to quiet them, and then went about telling them what had
happened. He urgently wanted to get this information about his escape and well-being to his co-
leader of The Way, Ya’acov: or as he is called in our English Bibles, James the brother of
Jesus. And because it’s an important piece of information and not trivia, just remember that
the Hebrew name Ya’acov translates in English to Jacob, not to James. So why do we find the
name James in our New Testaments? It happened upon the creation of the King James Bible.
In the New Testament, in honor of King James, the Bible editors substituted James for Jacob.
And it has remained so ever since.
5 / 8

Now let me make a comment that I will say upfront is at least partly my speculation, but I think
it is well founded and will interest you. Here in Acts 12 we see how King Agrippa and the Jews
of Judea (not all of course, just the most politically correct and zealous) went on a murderous
rage against The Way, or better, against the leadership of The Way. We really don’t have any
firm reason as to why this began. In any case, we do know from certain passages in the New
Testament and from extra-Biblical writings that the earliest Believers in Christ at times had to
meet in secret locations. This really occurred primarily in Jerusalem because elsewhere the
persecutions against the Believers weren’t so intense, or didn’t exist at all, so as to make
hiding necessary.
We have seen already in the Book of Acts how the persecutions would come and go. And of
course, when the persecutions became intense the Believers would keep a much lower profile
than when the persecutions lost steam. Thus it is believed that the secret sign of the Icthys (the
fish symbol) came to use about now. Some years ago my wife and I made a discovery in a
garbage dump in Jerusalem that has had quite an impact on us. It was the result of a map
taken from an old back issue of Biblical Archeology Review, and a small book I read that told
about the discovery of the 3 part symbol that has become a major symbol of Hebrew Roots
and Messianic organizations: the fish, to the menorah, to the Star of David.
I have taken a few of you to this spot we discovered and God willing on our next tour we’ll take
a few more of you there. It is off the beaten track and you won’t find guides or tourists milling
around. It is an underground cavern with its secret entrance hidden at the bottom of a large
Mikveh that in recent times has been fenced off, with a concrete bunker built around it to keep
people out. It was there in that cavern that about a half-century ago an elderly Greek Monk
found pottery shards with the 3 part symbol scratched on them, and the same symbol etched
into the cave walls. The pottery has been scientifically dated and it goes back to the time of
James, Peter, and Paul. The cavern is substantial in size and its location is such that there is
little doubt that at times of persecution the earliest Jewish Believers (probably the leadership)
met underground here. I’ll add a little anecdote that when I told Rabbi Baruch about it, he was
skeptical. I took him there, and it at least peaked his interest sufficiently that he went to the
Archeology department at Hebrew University where he was an adjunct professor at that time.
He told them my claims, and they verified that they were well aware of it, and that it was true
and accurate.
So as it concerns today’s lesson, I speculate this: James (a different James) had just been
executed. Peter was going to be executed as well but God miraculously saved him. Upon his
escape Peter goes in the dead of the night to Miriam’s house where Believers were stealthily
meeting in prayer for Peter. He gestures for them to be quiet; no doubt because in their
excitement from seeing he was alive they were making too much noise and he didn’t want
them to be discovered. Then in verse 17, he tells someone who is at the meeting to go and tell
James (Yeshua’s brother) and other brothers about what happened. Then Peter left quickly
and escaped from Jerusalem. Why? Peter was an escaped prisoner and in danger; and in fact
all the Believers were in danger. Why didn’t Peter go to James himself? James was in hiding.
The brothers spoken of were the leadership, part of the 12 disciples. Only a few of the
Believers in Jerusalem even knew where to find James. Peter likely didn’t know how to find
James. I have every reason to believe that when the events of Acts chapter 12 were occurring
6 / 8

James was hiding in that cavern that we found in a garbage dump on top of Mt. Zion. The
pieces fit together quite adequately to come to this conclusion.
In verse 18 we find the soldiers who had been guarding Peter were deeply disturbed to find
him missing; this was not going to end well for them. This is because it was Roman law that
the guards who allowed prisoners to escape could be held liable to suffer the punishment that
had been intended for that prisoner. Peter’s fate was going to be death.
But in addition to worrying for their lives, they were confused and perplexed because they were
still wearing the chains that had been attached to Peter. How does a man lying between two
soldiers slip out of his chains, making no noise at all, get dressed, leave the cell, go through
another set of doors with other guards who see nothing, and escape? Sure enough, Herod
doesn’t buy the guards’ outrageous story. He has Jerusalem searched, no trace of Peter is
found, and so after interrogating the Roman soldiers they are executed for what Agrippa no
doubt thinks is their complicity in Peter’s escape.
After this Herod Agrippa went to Caesarea Maritima for a time. Likely the trip had nothing to do
with Peter escaping because while he spent time in Jerusalem, he spent as much time if not
more in Caesarea, the seat of the Roman government over Judea. He was likely only in
Jerusalem to participate in the festival days, now concluded. Caesarea carried the nickname of
“Little Rome”, and he preferred being with the Roman aristocracy, which he had been since he
was a small child.
Next comes the lead-up to an interesting explanation of Agrippa’s sudden death. Starting in
verse 20 we are told that Agrippa was quite upset with the people of Tyre and Sidon. These 2
cities were on the southern Phoenician coast, and had long friendly relations with Israel going
back to the time of David and Solomon. Israel was perhaps the primary food supplier for these
two major cities. We are given no hint as to what this grave offense was that caused Herod’s
anger against these 2 cities. But it was so serious that a delegation of high officials came to
meet with Blastus, Agrippa’s chief negotiator.
What made this all the more critical is that very likely this was when the prophesied famine that
the Believing prophet Agav predicted would occur during the reign of Claudius happened: the
timing lines up quite well for it. It’s not that Israel was the only source of food for Tyre and
Sidon; but with an Empire-wide famine, food was scarce and expensive. Kings and
government officials set the food prices and determined where the supplies would go. So
basically Agrippa used what was very likely a trumped up grievance against Tyre and Sidon at
the time of a food crisis in order to extract some special political concessions that would give
him more power over them or make him a wealthier man, or both.
Blastus obtains what Herod Agrippa wanted from the delegation. And once accomplished it
was time to put on a big show. So Agrippa gets decked out in spectacular royal attire, sits on
his throne, and certain dignitaries come to hear Agrippa make a speech to them. They of
course respond with over-the-top flattery (something he fully expected and demanded), but
they even went so far as to say to him: “This is the voice of a god, not of a man!” Then Herod
Agrippa made a fatal mistake; rather than deflecting such ludicrous honor as being as a god
7 / 8

(and remember, Agrippa had made himself as a representative of the Jewish religion), he
accepted it. God struck him down and we’re told that he was eaten up by worms.
That the punishment of his blasphemy was immediate made it clear to all that his was divine
judgment. This was no folktale that we see here in the Bible or is it an exaggeration. Josephus
writes about Agrippa’s death and confirms what happened, the reason for it, and what he died
of. But let’s also be clear that these words about worms don’t necessarily mean that his death
was a result of having been eaten from the inside out by worms (but there is a hint that indeed
it could have). It is a standard understanding that when a corpse is put into the grave, that the
flesh is eaten up by worms. It is the natural result of death; decomposition. However it is also a
term that is used to describe especially the demise of the unrighteous, even though people
understood the same thing happened to anyone who died.
It is hard to know what the disease was that killed Herod. Josephus tells us that it was
something gastrointestinal. There actually are recorded incidents of parasites entering into
humans and consuming people from the inside out. In any case whatever it was, it was painful
and gruesome.
As we near the end of the chapter we’re informed that the Word of the Lord continued to grow
and multiply. No doubt now that Agrippa was dead, the persecutions against the Believers
once again calmed down since once again a Roman procurator ruled and this meant that the
Sanhedrin could no longer run around and incite the crowds or legally execute people like
James and Peter. So essentially a contrast is drawn between this wicked man, Agrippa, who
tried to eliminate The Way, and the great success that God achieved through The Way despite
all the persecution.
The final verse of this chapter marks a turn from the focus being on Jerusalem and Jews, to
the Diaspora and gentiles. The disciples that had gone to Antioch, but returned to Jerusalem,
would take John Mark with them back to Antioch. Recall that their purpose for coming back to
Jerusalem was to bring famine relief funds from generous Believers in Antioch. How long they
would stay in Jerusalem before returning to Antioch (that we will read about in Acts 13) is
unknown.
For the next several chapters the focus will shift to Paul and his missionary travels.
We’ll begin chapter 13 next time.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
8 / 8