EZRA
Lesson 9, Chapter 5 continued
We’ll continue today with the Book of Ezra; however we are in the midst of a substantial
detour to look at the invaluable contributions that the Prophets Haggai and Zechariah made to
the rebuilding of the Temple. These two Prophets were, predictably, bringing to the Jewish
returnees the encouraging and the cautioning Word of God that was needed so desperately to
readjust their motives and their priorities.
The books of Ezra and Nehemiah are almost entirely historical in their content; they list human
events and outcomes. Thus we get the perspective of the human beings involved at various
stages of rebuilding the Temple and the walls of Jerusalem, and repopulating the land of Judah
with native Jews. Haggai and Zechariah, however, give us the divine, spiritual perspective. A
long time ago, in our study of the Book of Genesis, I coined a term for this phenomenon of dual
spheres of reality, the invisible spiritual and the visible physical, operating simultaneously and
cooperatively: the Reality of Duality. And until and unless a human being recognizes this
foundational and immutable governing dynamic established at the beginning by Our Creator,
we shall forever operate with only a fraction of our available resources, and see our lives, our
experiences and our world through but an incomplete, therefore altered, reality.
Therefore whereas we’ve spent much time establishing a timeline of historical events in Ezra,
and trying to put historical activities in perspective and connecting each of the dots, the oracles
of God from these 2 prophets affords us the opportunity to examine more of God’s nature and
His principles and how they affect His people and His enemies as well as mankind’s historical
trajectory.
Thus as Ezra chapter 5 opens, verse 1 explains that Haggai and Zechariah prophesied to the
Judahites in the name of the God of Israel. And verse 2 tells us that as a result of God’s
oracles Zerubbabel, the leader of the Jewish people, and Yeshua, the High Priest, responded
by actively beginning to build the Temple. The rebuilding project had been shelved for 35 years
as a result of the constant social and political pressures exerted by various groups of local
inhabitants, with the most vocal and antagonistic of the groups being the Samarians. The
Samarians consisted of gentiles who had been forcibly moved from other nations in the
Assyrian Empire into the former territory of the northern 10 Israelite tribes some 2 centuries
earlier. And some of them had intermarried with the small fragments of Hebrews that had in
various ways escaped deportation or were intentionally left behind to serve their Assyrian
conquerors in one capacity or another.
1 / 10

The remaining Ephraim-Israelites had 400 years earlier fallen into a perverted form of worship
because Jeroboam, the first king over the 10 northern tribes (after the civil war that tore the
nation of Israel into two following King Solomon’s death), decided that he wanted not only a
political but a religious divide between his kingdom and Judah. Thus he ordered that a golden
calf was built as a molten image of YHWH. An alternate and fraudulent priesthood modeled
after the Jerusalem based priesthood was established, and also a Temple was built in
Samaria.
So when the exiled Jews returned to Jerusalem with the mandate from Cyrus, King of Persia,
to rebuild their House of God, they were immediately approached by a delegation of
Samarians who insisted that they be involved in all phases of rebuilding the Temple. They felt
that they had an inherent right to be part of the process (meaning that they would also have
participation in its operations and rituals), because of a belief that they worshipped the same
God as the Jews. Zerubbabel unequivocally refused their offer.
This would be a good opportunity to again address the issue of how one identifies who God is,
and when one is seeking or worshipping God just who it is they are seeking or worshipping.
Sometimes it seems to us as though this issue was something faced only by ancient and/or
primitive people. But this is a present problem in the 21
st
century, and a growing danger within
our Christian institutions. And while a Theologian might want to nuance the matter far more
than I do, the bottom line is that you can only know and indentify God by means of his name
and his attributes (that is, his nature, his character). Thus as concerns our story in Ezra, the
moment the Israelites of the 10 tribes built that Golden Calf they assigned to Yehoveh a
substantially different attribute than who he actually is. The moment that they created an
unauthorized Priesthood, and built a different Temple in a place not chosen by YHWH as the
place where His name was to be established, they fundamentally changed the attributes and
commandments of the god they claimed to follow. Thus who the northern 10 tribes defined as
God evolved into something fundamentally different than who He actually is according to His
Torah, His prophets and to all of His Word. Once that happened, they found themselves
worshipping a figment of their imaginings and something of their own creation, and not the God
of the Bible. They were worshipping a false god even though they didn’t think so.
Was that their intent; did they mean to create and worship a false god? It certainly doesn’t
appear so. But this is a profound object lesson that is as fundamental to our faith as is
salvation in Christ. To remake God in our own image, no matter how high-minded and
pragmatic and feel-good and modern that it might seem to us, is idolatry. Where can we find
the true name, attributes and definition of who God is? In the Bible, first and foremost in the
Torah. And if we stray from that definition by adding to it; or we subtract from it by disqualifying
any of His attributes, or by over emphasizing some attributes while diminishing others; or if we
change His name or assign Him new and different characteristics, we have made a grave error
that will likely lead to eternal consequences. And that is because what we are actually
worshipping is something other than God. I can say with confidence that all beings, human or
spiritual, are essentially a sum of their attributes and characteristics. Thus we can no more look
2 / 10

at an Ape and declare that it is but another kind of human being, than we can look at a Golden
Calf, or worship a European Jesus, or declare that the Lord has shed all other of His attributes
than love and mercy and still call Him Yehoveh, God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Open your Bibles to Haggai chapter 2. Last time we discussed chapter 1 at length and
discovered that while the Jews felt that the severe opposition they faced that had brought the
reconstruction of the Temple to a 35-year halt, was a reasonable cause for ceasing their
efforts. And apparently they also felt that God would surely agree because as it says in verse
2:
CJB
Haggai 1:2 "Here is what ADONAI-Tzva'ot says: 'This people is saying that now isn't
the time- the time hasn't yet arrived for ADONAI's house to be rebuilt.'"
The Jewish people are assuming that because there is tough opposition to rebuilding the
Temple, it’s not time yet for it to happen. I suppose they expected that building the Temple
would not be unlike their release from captivity. That is, they were just kind of living their lives,
assimilating into the Babylonian culture, enjoying the favor that Nebuchadnezzar and his
successors bestowed upon the Jews, when all of a sudden Persia conquers Babylon and
almost overnight their captivity ends. And what did the Jews do to bring their release about?
Nothing. God used Cyrus to punish and defeat Babylon and then to deliver His people. So
when the exiles go back to Judah and find nothing but opposition and threats, I imagine their
instincts were to sit back and wait (as they did up in Babylon) until God removed all the
impediments to rebuilding the Temple and the holy city. However that is certainly not what the
Lord intended and He tells them so in verse 4.
CJB
Haggai 1:4 "So is now the time for you to be living in your own paneled houses, while
this house lies in ruins?
Thus we have the physical human perspective clashing with the divine spiritual perspective.
The good news is that Haggai’s message achieved its purpose and the Jews got back to work,
regardless of the fierce opposition to the project.
So let’s re-read Haggai chapter 2 and see what came next.
RE-READ HAGGAI CHAPTER 2:1 - 9
In chapter 1, Haggai received his first oracle on the 1
st
day of the 6
th
month of Darius’s 2
nd
year
3 / 10

in power. This would have been 521 or 520 B.C. Now about 50 days later towards the end of
the 7
th
month Haggai received a second oracle. Just like the first one, he was to take this
message to Zerubbabel and to the High Priest, however this time the message is also to go to
the people. And a question begins the oracle: who among you saw the glory of the first house?
That is, who of the returnees might have actually seen the Temple before Nebuchadnezzar
destroyed it around 70 years earlier? Indeed some had personally seen Solomon’s Temple
before it became a ruin. They would have been children or young adults at the time but are
quite elderly right now. And so the Lord continues with: it seems like nothing to you now,
doesn’t it? At the moment all that remained of the Temple was an aborted attempt at building
a foundation, and just one look at made it obvious that it wasn’t going to measure up to what
had once been. This greatly disturbed especially those who had envisioned a new Temple that
was as fabulous as the original; but now reality was setting in. Nonetheless the Lord
encouraged them and told them that they had no reason to keep procrastinating; it was time to
build….right NOW…..and that He was with them. Be mindful that these last words mean that God
has ended His temporary abandonment of them, and that He is once again with the people of
Judah.
Verse 5 says that the reason that He is with them is based on “the word that I promised in a
covenant with you when you came out of Egypt.” That “word” and covenant are what Moses
received on Mt. Sinai and begins with:
CJB
Exodus 20:1 Then God said all these words:

2
"I am ADONAI your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the abode of
slavery.
“I am Adonai YOUR God……” YHWH is reminding Judah through Haggai that nothing has
changed since the days of Moses. Yes, Judah went astray. Yes, Judah was punished with
exile. Yes God turned His holy back on His people for the 70 years that He promised that He
would in consequence of their unfaithfulness towards Him. But, through the prophet Jeremiah
He also promised that He would take them back; He remains their God.
READ JEREMIAH 29:4 – 14
It was Jeremiah’s words that the Jews in exile clung to. It was Jeremiah’s words that Daniel
keep at the forefront of his mind and as time passed he began to wonder exactly when that 70
years of exile would end. But it was the Mosaic Covenant of Mt. Sinai that the Lord said was
the basis for re-establishing His relationship with His people.
Then in verse 6 we hit some controversy. It speaks of the Lord shaking all the nations
4 / 10

(meaning gentile nations) and that great wealth would flow into Judah. In addition this rebuilt
Temple would epitomize God’s glory. In fact, says the Lord in verse 9, the glory of this new
Temple will eventually surpass that of Solomon’s. Further it is in this place (in Jerusalem at
this Temple) that He would grant shalom, peace and well-being. The controversy is this: is this
speaking of a near future to Ezra, or a far future? A future that perhaps has, even today, not
yet arrived?
We could spent a lot of time going over the many reasonable scholarly debates about this
prophecy, and indeed how we interpret this matters to both our understanding of the ancient
times and perhaps our future. So to cut to the chase, here is how I interpret this passage: it is
both a near term (to Ezra) and a long term prophecy. This it-happens and then it-happens-
again nature of prophecies is something we’ve discussed on numerous occasions and
hindsight has shown this aspect of prophecy to be so.
God shaking the heavens and the earth, the sea and the dry land, and shaking the nations
indicates an enormous upheaval and change. And as Zechariah is going to show us, the
central change will occur within earthly governments and powers. But what is described is so
broadly defined that we can’t confine it to only one event or one era. Further, verse 6 begins
God’s statement by telling us that “it won’t be long” until this shaking happens. Therefore, for
those who say that now, 2500 years from the giving of this oracle that the Lord STILL hasn’t
shaken the heavens and earth and the nations, cheapens the plain meaning of the words. Yes,
it is true, that to the Lord a day is as a thousand years. And the Lord lives in place of eternity
whereas we dwell in a place where time dominates us. Thus it “won’t be long” is a way to
express relative time. And if He meant that it would be thousands of years, then to say that “it
won’t be long” would have little meaning to humans. So, did the Lord shake the nations and
make huge changes on earth not very long from Ezra’s day? Yes He did. Around 190 years
later the Greeks would conquer the Persians and fundamentally change the world. A new
Empire arose, the Greek Empire, the 3
rd
Empire as foretold by Daniel’s dream statue that
symbolizes 4 successive gentile world empires. But did that event shake the heavens
(meaning what we see up in the sky….the stars, the galaxies, the moon and the sun)? Not so
far as we know, unless this is just a statement of exaggeration or a figure of speech (and I
don’t believe that it is).
Thus this prophecy would first only partially happen (yet in a very large way) around 330 B.C.
when Alexander the Great became king over the known world. But the fullest fulfillment is yet
to come. It must always be remembered (and please, tuck this away in your memory banks)
that all prophecies are given in relation to Israel and to God’s people. They always concern
some outcome or another for the land and the people of Israel. What happens to the gentile
nations is invariably for Israel’s sake and is meant to kick the ball forward in the Lord’s
redemption plans. Thus the shaking of nations and the shaking of the heavens portends an
outcome that is going to bear greatly upon Israel. Will gentiles and gentile nations (meaning
every nation on earth EXCEPT for Israel) be affected? Yes, and often to a catastrophic extent.
But much like horrific things happened to Egypt for the sake of God’s people, so will every
5 / 10

prophetic happening that is still ahead of us happen for the sake of God’s people. The good
news is that (as it affects individuals) if you are truly redeemed in Yeshua, you are grafted in
among God’s People, so it is for our sakes as well.
But it is quite different when it comes to nations as opposed to individuals. The Lord is willing
to sacrifice every nation on earth for the sake of His land and people Israel. And part of the
reason for this is because the human governments of every nation on earth (no matter their
political philosophy or structure) must and will come to a crashing end because an entirely new
and permanent divine government, led by Messiah Yeshua, will replace all of them. And where
will its world capital be? Jerusalem of Israel.
And yet, would Ezra’s Temple ever rightfully fulfill the prophecy of verse 9 that says that this
new house will surpass the glory of the old? Yes; Ezra’s Temple would be renovated,
remodeled and expanded by King Herod 500 years later. The glory of Herod’s Temple would
indeed surpass Solomon’s in every way. This same pattern I believe will happen with the next
Temple, often called the 3
rd
Temple; the one that is soon coming. This is the one that the Anti-
Christ will enter into and declare himself to be god. While this is only my opinion (because
unfulfilled prophecy cannot be seen fully or clearly except in hindsight), I believe that Ezekiel’s
Temple will be much like Herod’s in that it will be a large-scale renovation and expansion of
the End Times Temple that could be constructed any time, now. Everything that is needed for
the next Temple is ready and in place, except for the will to do it. To clarify: Ezra’s Temple
was and is seen as the 2
nd
Temple (Solomon’s being the 1
st
) because Solomon’s Temple had
been destroyed right down to the foundations and thus Ezra’s was a totally new structure.
Herod’s Temple is usually seen as merely a grand extension of the 2
nd
Temple (rather than as
a 3
rd
Temple), because Ezra’s Temple was not destroyed. And the coming Temple, the 3
rd
Temple, will be the final Temple, in my view, but later it will be brought to an even greater
glory. I see nothing in Scriptures that definitively suggests that the 3
rd
Temple will be destroyed
despite global war and the decimation of Israel that is coming and then replaced by a 4
th
Temple. Might it be damaged? Certainly. But nothing suggests that it will be become a heap,
either through war or by a demolition crew to make way for a 4
th
Temple, described in the Bible
as Ezekiel’s Temple. Yet, I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see, won’t we?
Verse 10 begins a 3
rd
oracle from God through Haggai. It occurred 2 months and 3 days after
Haggai’s 2
nd
oracle. So these oracles are coming fast and furious; even faster, really, than it
appears to us reading only Haggai. So I need to quality the statement about this being God’s
3rd oracle through Haggai because the Jewish people received another oracle as well; one
from Zechariah. They received Zechariah’s 1
st
oracle in between Haggai’s 2
nd
and 3
rd
oracles.
In other words: the 1
st
oracle God gave to the Jews happened in the 6
th
month, through
Haggai. The 2
nd
oracle happened in the 7
th
month, again through Haggai. The 3
rd
oracle God
gave to the Jews was from Zechariah, and it happened in the 8
th
month. And the one that
we’re about to discuss is actually the 4
th
oracle given to the Jews, this one in the 9
th
month, but
now we’re back to Haggai as the prophet of record. So as of now, the score is 3 oracles for
Haggai versus 1 for Zechariah.
6 / 10

Rather than switch just yet to studying Zechariah, we’ll finish out Haggai to keep some
continuity. Haggai’s 3
rd
oracle is hugely problematic. I can’t begin to tell you the variations of
opinions about it that has led even to some rather dramatic changes to the Scripture passage
by some scholars, including Rashi. Let’s see how quickly you can spot the issue.
READ HAGGAI 2:10 – end
The oracle takes on a strange opening rhetorical question that is said to be aimed at the
cohanim, the priests. Now, who answered as the representative of the priests, we’re not told.
We could probably reasonably speculate that it was Yeshua, the High Priest, (as some
scholars and Rabbis assert) but it seems awfully easy to merely say Yeshua, or High Priest, if
indeed that was the case. So probably it was a council of the most senior common priests who
were approached by Haggai, and after some discussion they give Haggai their answer. And
here is the question posed to them by Yehoveh:
Haggai 2:12 if someone carries meat that has been set aside as holy in a fold of his
cloak; and then he lets his cloak touch bread, stew, wine, olive oil or any other food;
does that food become holy too?'" The cohanim answered, "No."
Then a 2
nd
question is asked by the Lord through Haggai, presumably to this same group of
cohanim, priests.
CJB
Haggai 2:13 Then Hagai asked, "If someone who is unclean from having had contact
with a corpse touches any of these [food items], will they become unclean?" The
cohanim answered, "They become unclean."
Ok. Anyone have any problems with this, so far? Well I do; and so do many Rabbis. And the
problem is quite straightforward: in verse 12, regarding a person carrying sanctified meat in
their priestly apron (meaning meat that is part of a sacrificial offering), if that priestly garment
accidentally touches other food items, does the food that it touches contract holiness? The
priests answer no; and if indeed they did answer the question that way, they are wrong.
Because in fact holiness is infectious, and we have a number of examples of infectious
holiness in the Bible. One of the most famous being out in the wilderness, during the exodus
from Egypt, when Korah thought to get 250 men to bring their fire pans with hot coals and
incense in them, and to come to the Wilderness Tabernacle to offer the incense to the Lord. As
they neared the Tabernacle, the Lord sent a burst of heat and fire upon them that incinerated
every last man. But the Lord commanded this as well:
7 / 10

CJB
Numbers 17:1 ADONAI said to Moshe,

2
"Tell El'azar the son of Aharon the cohen to remove the fire pans from the fire, and
scatter the smoldering coals at a distance, because they have become holy.

3
Also the fire pans of these men, whose sin cost them their lives, have become holy,
because they were offered before ADONAI. Therefore, have them hammered into plates
to cover the altar. This will be a sign for the people of Isra'el."
The proximity to God at the Tabernacle infected these men, their hot coals, and their metal fire
pans with holiness. But the Book of Ezekiel addresses this matter of holiness being infectious
from another angle; what happens with holy garments when they touch other things?
Ezekiel 44:17-19 CJB
17
"'Once they enter the gates of the inner courtyard, they are to wear linen clothing;
they are not to wear any wool while serving at the gates of the inner courtyard or inside
it.

18
They are to wear linen turbans on their heads and linen underclothes on their bodies,
and they are not to wear anything that makes them sweat.

19
Before going out to the people in the outer courtyard, they are to remove the clothes
in which they minister, lay them in the holy rooms, and put on other clothes; so that
they won't transmit holiness to the people by means of their clothing.
I could exhibit a number of other passages that express the same thought, but the point is that
these priestly garments can and do transmit their holiness; yet these priests said, no they
don’t. Wrong answer. Could this have been a copyist error? Do we have a bad translation?
That is what some scholars think. Rashi goes so far as to say that as used here the that
standard word for “holy” in the Bible, the Hebrew word kadosh,doesn’t mean holy, it means
defiled. But that is a rationalization that, for me, is too far-fetched to even consider.
The next question asked about uncleanness regarding a person coming into contact with a
corpse, and then touching food, and whether the food becomes unclean; the priests give the
correct answer: “yes”. Then through Haggai, in verse 14, the Lord says that being unclean is
the condition of this people (am) and this nation (goy) before Me. Here we have another
conundrum. It is usual for the Lord to refer to His people as His am, His people. But goy has
long been a term reserved for the gentile nations, not for Israel or Judah. So the question is: is
the Lord just repeating Himself and calling the Jews BOTH His am (a people) and a goy (a
nation)? Or is He speaking about two different entities? My best stab at it is that since there
8 / 10

indeed are representatives of two different groups that will be involved in one way or another
with the rebuilding of Temple (the am, meaning the Jewish people, and the goy, referring the
part Hebrew/part gentile Samarians who will necessary be supplying building materials and
other needed construction items), both are being called equally unclean before the Lord
because of their behavior and attitudes.
Further, notice this: after answering the question about the holy priestly garments being used
to carry sacrificial meat touching other food and, according the priests, NOT transmitting their
holiness to the food, the question and its answer are just left hanging. In other words, the 2
nd
question about uncleanness, which IS answered correctly, is what the Lord uses to illustrate
His determination that the am and the goy are unclean in His eyes. There is no follow-up with
the substance or purpose of the 1
st
question. And, we notice that the priests are not exempt
from this determination that all are unclean. It makes me think that we are meant to notice the
wrong answer from the priests who ought to know the answer to whether holiness can be
transmitted by their priestly garments in order that we see that the priests and the common
people are all unclean in God’s eyes because they are willfully ignorant about the most basic
questions of the operation of holiness and defilement, which are fundamental to the Laws of
Moses and therefore to the worship of God.
Remember; up in Babylon the Law of Moses was not observed so far as we read in the
Scriptures. And we also learn that the exiles began to invent rituals and observances to try to
obtain a measure of cleanness and atonement, even though those inventions are not
authorized by the Torah. So why should we think that the laypeople or the priests were
knowledgeable on the intricacies of the Law?
So starting in verse 15, the Lord explains that it is because the Jews don’t obey the Law (even
though they might think they do) their harvests are small, winds dried up the ground, hail came
and harmed crops and animals, and more. However says the Lord in verse 19, from this day
forward (the day they begin work on the Temple in a ritually clean manner) the Lord will
reverse His policy of holding back and frustrating His people’s efforts and instead will allow His
blessings to flow abundantly on His people. He will now view the people as clean instead of
unclean.
Then to end the Book of Haggai, a 4
th
oracle to Haggai (the 5
th
one overall counting the one
through Zechariah) is given. And in some ways it is an expansion of the 2
nd
one. God says that
He will shake the heavens and the earth, overturn kingdoms, destroy their strength, and then
speaking of chariots and riders and horses, says essentially that He will destroy their war-
making implements and capacity.
But the final verse needs a bit of explanation. It says that “when that day comes” the Lord
shall wear Zerubbabel like a signet ring, for God has chosen him. First, this can only be
9 / 10

referring to a time when kingdoms have been overturned and war machinery has been
destroyed, etc. because that is the context. None of this happened during Zerubbabel’s or
Ezra’s or Nehemiah’s time. I think the tremendous 19
th
century Bible scholar C.F. Kiel has it
right; it is not the person of Zerubbabel but the office that Zerubbabel holds that is being
referred to. Zerubbabel is the current Jewish leader of the Jewish people. But even more, from
God’s perspective the issue is that he is a royal descendant of King David through
Zerubbabel’s father Sh’alti’el. So this is very likely a Messianic End Times prophecy and that
is why it is given separately, as Haggai’s 4
th
oracle. This prophecy explains that after the final
shaking of the earth and heavens and of nations, the leader of the Jews, who is a member of
the Royal House of David, will be worn by the Father as His signet ring. That is, this Jewish
leader will have the full authority of the Father. Who else can that be but Yeshua HaMashiach,
sitting on His throne after He returns? The prophets and the Book of Revelation tells us that
after Armageddon when all the world’s war machines and armies have been defeated, and
after the heavens have been shaken and the moon turns bloody red and the stars fall from the
sky, then shall our Lord Yeshua, a descendant of King David, rule the world as King.
Next time we’ll take up the prophet Zechariah.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
10 / 10