2
ND
KINGS
Week 39, Chapters 24 and 25

We’re entering the home stretch in our study of 2
nd
Kings. This week and next should finish up
the book. But what finishing up the book means, is that Judah will then be officially exiled from
the Promised Land. At that point, none of the tribes of Israel will be living in the land that God
first set apart for them in His promise to Abraham. That doesn’t mean that no Israelites
remained in the land following the exile. For various reasons a mixed group of the remnants of
the 12 tribes were able to stay, in both the south (Judah) and in the north (Israel, also known
as Ephraim or the northern kingdom).
This Babylonian exile is earth shaking in the history of Israel; in fact it was in Babylon where
the religion of Judaism, and the concept of synagogues as houses of worship, was born. The
Babylonian exile plays such a role in the plan of redemption that the God of Israel is laying out,
that various aspects of that exile are spoken of in a number of Old Testament books. We’ll be
using quotes from several of them in today’s study.
Last time we spent a good deal of our effort in Jeremiah 27. But today I’m going to try to chart
the historical path, and connect the dots, of the final 20 years of Judah’s existence. The crux
of the Jeremiah 27 passages is a difficult one for both Jews and Christians to accept; Rabbis
have worked in some pretty fanciful ways to explain it away, and Christian leadership simply
says that God essentially changed how He operates once New Testament times arrived so
whatever God did is irrelevant to modern Believers. And the crux issue is that God decided to
be on Babylon’s side for awhile, and against Israel. He decided to turn Judah over to Babylon
as a punishment for their decade after decade of ever-worsening apostasy and unfaithfulness.
And He told Judah that they were to willingly bow down to Babylon; they should not resist. The
king and government of Judah should be co-operative, subdued, and never consider rebelling
because to rebel against Babylon would be to rebel directly against God. Neither Babylon nor
King Nebuchadnezzar is portrayed as evil in God’s eyes; rather they have been raised up to
be God’s hand of justice and judgment upon His people. It is Judah that is currently evil, and is
they who are thus receiving God’s severe sentence against them.
As bible students and modern day believers we have grown used to the idea that to fight
against Israel, or to do harm to Israel, was automatically the same thing as coming against
Yehoveh. This is because Israel, the land, was God’s set-apart kingdom. And Israel, the
people, was God’s set-apart people. But God makes it clear that we ought not to assume that
just because a person or a nation of people is redeemed and set-apart for Him that they are
immune from His punishment, or that He won’t allow us to be put into subjugation or
oppressed by another person or nation if we trespass seriously enough and for long enough.
1 / 11

And this is stated outright in Jeremiah 27; no guesswork is needed on our part.
CJB
Jeremiah 27:5 "'"I made the earth, humankind, and the animals on the earth by my great power and
my outstretched arm; and I give it to whom it seems right to me.”

When God’s redeemed rebel against the Lord, whether it be ancient Israel, modern Israel, or
modern Believers in Yeshua, He has and He will take action. And Paul tells us to expect
exactly that as disciples of Yeshua.
Romans 11:17-22 CJB

17
But if some of the branches were broken off, and you- a wild olive- were grafted in among them and
have become equal sharers in the rich root of the olive tree,
18
then don't boast as if you were better than the branches! However, if you do boast, remember that you
are not supporting the root, the root is supporting you.
19
So you will say, "Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in."
20
True, but so what? They were broken off because of their lack of trust. However, you keep your place
only because of your trust. So don't be arrogant; on the contrary, be terrified!
21
For if God did not spare the natural branches, he certainly won't spare you!
22
So take a good look at God's kindness and his severity: on the one hand, severity toward those who fell
off; but, on the other hand, God's kindness toward you- provided you maintain yourself in that kindness!
Otherwise, you too will be cut off!

In 2
nd
Kings 24 we found that Y’hoyakim, Josiah’s son, had taken over after another son of
Josiah, Y’ho’achaz, after he was on the throne for only 3 months. Y’ho’achaz was removed
and imprisoned by the Egyptian Pharaoh Neco, who then placed him with his brother
Y’hoyakim. However Y’hoyakim would be a vassal first to Egypt and then to Babylon.
Y’hoyakim was a foolish man, we are told. He was an evil king who behaved in the way of the
other apostate kings of Judah that preceded him. So God Himself came against Jehoiakim by
inciting King Nebuchadnezzar to send a military force of mercenaries from Amon, Moab, and
Aram (Syria), led by his own Babylonian commanders, to attack Judah.
2 / 11

The invasion took place in the month of Kislev (December) 598 B.C. And the result was exactly
what Jeremiah had warned would happen if Judah didn’t bow down in contrite submission to
Babylon.
Jeremiah 27:11-13 CJB

11
But the nation that puts its neck under the yoke of the king of Bavel and serves him, that nation I will
allow to remain on their own soil," says ADONAI. "They will farm it and live there."'"
12
Then I spoke to Tzidkiyahu king of Y'hudah in just the same way: "Put your necks under the yoke of the
king of Bavel, serve him and his people, and you will live.
13
Why would you want to die, you and your people, by sword, famine and plague- which is what ADONAI
has decreed for the nation that will not serve the king of Bavel?

Surprisingly, 2
nd
Kings 24 gives us almost no information about what happened to Judah and
to King Jehoiakim as a result of this invasion. All it says is:
2Kings 24:6 CJB
6
Then Y'hoyakim slept with his ancestors, and Y'hoyakhin his son took his place as
king.

However there are considerably more details available in other books. For instance in 2
nd
Chronicles 36 we get this:
2Chronicles 36:5-6 CJB

5
Y'hoyakim was twenty-five years old when he began his reign, and he ruled for eleven years in
Yerushalayim. He did what was evil from the perspective of ADONAI his God.
6
N'vukhadnetzar king of Bavel attacked him and bound him in chains to carry him off to Bavel.

We have a conundrum. 2
nd
Kings 24 says Jehoiakim died in Jerusalem, and 2
nd
Chronicles 36
says he was taken away prisoner to Babylon. Scholars have debated over which of these two
statements is accurate, because they can’t both be right. In general the evidence is that he
3 / 11

died in Jerusalem. For one thing, the rather detailed and complete Babylonian Chronicles that
charts the names of various kings taken prisoner during the many invasions of kingdoms and
nations by Babylon makes no mention of Jehoiakim being arrested and brought to Babylon.
Further, we have a prediction of Y’hoyakim’s violent death from the mouth of the Prophet
Jeremiah.
Jeremiah 22:18-19 CJB

18
Therefore here is what ADONAI says concerning Y'hoyakim the son of Yoshiyahu, king of Y'hudah:
"There will be no one to mourn for him, 'Oh! My brother!' or 'Oh! My sister!' There will be no one to mourn
for him, 'Oh! My master!' or 'Oh! His glory!'
19
He will be given a donkey's 'burial'- dragged out the gates of Yerushalayim and thrown away [to rot].
Jeremiah 36:27-30 CJB

27
Then this word of ADONAI came to Yirmeyahu after the king had burned the scroll with the words
Barukh had written at Yirmeyahu's dictation:
28
"Take another scroll, and write on it all the words that were on the first scroll, which Y'hoyakim the king
of Y'hudah burned up.
29
And as far as Y'hoyakim king of Y'hudah is concerned, you are to say that ADONAI says, 'You burned
this scroll, asking, "Why did you write in it that the king of Bavel will certainly come and destroy this land
and leave it without either humans or animals?"
30
Therefore ADONAI says this about Y'hoyakim king of Y'hudah: "He will have no one to occupy David's
throne; and his dead body will be thrown out to lie in the heat by day and in the frost by night.


Taken together with the 2
nd
Kings 24 statement that he died at Jerusalem at the time of the
invasion, it is anyone’s guess where the tradition came from about Jehoiakim being taken
prisoner to Babylon. But it appears to be an error.
Then in 2
nd
Chronicles we find that articles were looted from the Temple and taken to Babylon.
2Chronicles 36:7 CJB
7
N'vukhadnetzar also carried the articles in the house of ADONAI away to Bavel
and put them in his temple in Bavel.
4 / 11

Not just loot, but also citizens of Judah were deported to Babylon in retribution for
Y’hoyakim’s rebellion, including the namesake of a bible book that we will soon be studying.
Daniel 1:1-6 CJB

CJB
Daniel 1:1 In the third year of the reign of Y'hoyakim king of Y'hudah, N'vukhadnetzar king of Bavel
came to Yerushalayim and laid siege to it;
2
and Adonai handed Y'hoyakim king of Y'hudah over to him, along with some of the articles from the
house of God. He took them to the land of Shin'ar, to the house of his god and placed the articles in the
storehouse of his god.
3
The king ordered Ashp'naz, the eunuch serving as his chief officer, to bring into the palace from the
people of Isra'el some of royal or noble descent.
4
They were to be boys without physical defect, handsome in appearance, versed in all kinds of wisdom,
quick to learn, discerning, and having the capacity to serve in the king's palace; and he was to teach them
the language and literature of the Kasdim.
5
The king assigned them a daily portion of his own food and the wine he drank, and they were to be cared
for in this way for three years. At the end of this time they were to become the king's attendants.
6
Among these, from the people of Y'hudah, were Dani'el, Hananyah, Misha'el and 'Azaryah.

So here we find that it was under the reign of King Jehoiakim that Babylon first invaded Judah.
But before Judah was invaded, King Nebuchadnezzar entered a peace treaty with King
Jehoiakim that Judah would be a vassal to Babylon. After 3 years Y’hoyakim rebelled (quit
paying tribute), and then in 598 B.C. Judah was invaded and Y’hoyakim was killed by Babylon
in order to restore their dominance over Judah. It was at this time that the vassal relationship
turned to exile. And it didn’t have to happen. The Lord was satisfied to merely have Judah
placed under Babylon’s control and Babylon’s King for some indefinite period of time. In
reality, that was the punishment that God had decided to inflict upon Judah for their apostasy.
If only they had listened to Jeremiah’s Word from the Lord, Judah didn’t have to be destroyed;
a descendant of David could have remained sitting on Judah’s throne (even if he was a vassal
king to Babylon), and the people could have stayed in their own land, farming, tending herds
and flocks, generally doing what they had always done. There is no evidence that Babylon
acted as barbarians and harmed or mistreated the people of Judah, or even forced their gods
and their religion upon them.
5 / 11

This exile occurred ONLY because Y’hoyakim and his government administration disobeyed
God by rebelling against Babylon because they didn’t like being a vassal and having their
independence taken away, and they also didn’t want to accept God’s punishment upon them.
Let’s re-read a portion of 2
nd
Kings 24 and deal with the next king of Judah, Y’hoyakhin.
RE-READ 2
ND
KINGS 24:7 – end
Y’hoyakhin was the son of Y’hoyakim. He was 18 years old when he took over the throne (he
was given it by King Nebuchadnezzar), and just like his half-brother Y’ho’achaz he only
managed to rule for 3 months before trouble overtook him. The words of 2nd Chronicles 36 say
that he ruled for exactly 3 months and 10 days. But also recognize that 2
nd
Chronicles says
that he was 8 years old (not 18) when he became king. While some Rabbis have gone through
all sorts of gyrations to try and explain away this discrepancy, none is needed. The number 8 is
a copyist error. This was not a child king and the context makes that abundantly clear.
Being an impetuous and immature 18 year old, he immediately defied Babylon and Yehoveh
and he rebelled. So once again Babylon sent its army to re-establish control. First
Nebuchadnezzar sent his generals and his military to put the city under siege, and he only
came to take personal command at a later date. It happened in the month of Adar (March) in
the year 597 B.C. The young Jewish king no doubt never counted on Nebuchadnezzar
reacting this way, and so when the army showed up, and the siege began, he rather quickly
panicked, opened the city gates and along with his family and members of his royal court went
out to surrender to the King of Babylon in hopes of mercy. But the king didn’t trust him; rightly
so because young Y’hoyakhin’s father had also pledged loyalty to Nebuchadnezzar only to
betray him at the first opportunity. So he and his family and government officials were arrested
and hauled off to Babylon.
This event had been predicted by Jeremiah. Notice as you hear these passages that
Y’hoyakhin was earlier known by another name, Koniyahu.
Jeremiah 22:24-30 CJB

24
"As I live," says ADONAI, "even if Koniyahu the son of Y'hoyakim king of Y'hudah were the signet ring
on my right hand, I would pull you off
25
and hand you over to those who seek your life, to those you fear, N'vukhadretzar king of Bavel and the
Kasdim.
26
I will hurl you and the mother who gave birth to you into a country different from the one you were born
in, and you will die there.
27
They will not return to the country to which they long to return."
6 / 11

28
Is this man Koniyahu a despised, broken pot, an instrument nobody wants? Why are they being thrown
out? Why are he and his offspring thrown out into a country they do not know?
29
Oh, land, land, land! Hear the word of ADONAI!
30
This what ADONAI says: "List this man as childless; he is a lifetime failure- none of his offspring will
succeed, none will sit on David's throne or rule again in Y'hudah."
So now a 2
nd
wave of people from Judah was deported to Babylon. About 10,000 people that
represented the cream of the crop of Judah’s population were taken. Notice that verse 14 says
that “all” Yerushalayim was taken, and then goes on to say that “all” the princes and “all” the
bravest soldiers were included. It needs to be stated that the use of the term “all” in the bible is
not a precise term; it does not mean 100%. It is what we might call in English grammar
hyperbole. It means to express a significant amount; the vast majority that is large enough to
represent the whole. It is no different than how we use the term “all” today. Our kids might say
that they get in trouble “all the time”. Or that “all” of our luck is bad luck. Or that “all” doctors
are rich or that “all” politicians are greedy. “All” means “predominately”, not “every last one”.
Thus when we hear that “all” nations will come against Israel in the End Times, it is not
absolute; it does NOT mean that there won’t be a few nations who stay out of the fray. But it
does mean that bulk of the earth’s powerful nations will. So don’t let the term “all” as it is
used in the bible mislead you. It was never intended to mean “all" inclusive with no
exceptions”.
We also read in verse 13 that even more of the Temple furnishings and treasures were taken.
In the first invasion and wave of deportation in 598 B.C. it was things like vessels and pans and
gold and silver articles that were taken. But this time the result was more dramatic and more
destructive. Larger articles of precious metal, so too large to transport, were cut into pieces
and taken to Babylon so that they might be melted down and reformed into something else.
But take note: the Temple itself was NOT destroyed nor was Jerusalem decimated. This was
but the 2
nd
stage in the process of emptying Judah of its people, and there was one more to
go. It was an escalation in response to Judah rebelling for a 2
nd
time in only a couple of years.
And, once again, the deportations and looting of the Temple didn’t have to be. If
only Y’hoyakim and then his son Y’hoyakhin had been obedient to God’s Word from
Jeremiah, and submitted to Babylon as Yehoveh instructed, then the Babylonian army
wouldn’t have invaded in retribution.
Now, as to the numbers of people that 2
nd
Kings 24:14 says were sent away to Babylon: here it
says it was 10,000. Then in verse 16 it speaks of 7,000 plus 1,000. If we look at Jeremiah 52
we hear this:
Jeremiah 52:28-30 CJB

7 / 11

28
The numbers of people deported by N'vukhadretzar were as follows: in the seventh year, 3,023 persons
from Y'hudah;
29
in the eighteenth year of N'vukhadretzar, 832 persons from Yerushalayim;
30
and in the twenty-third year of N'vukhadretzar, N'vuzar'adan the commander of the guard deported 745
persons from Y'hudah; the total comes to 4,600 persons.

In the end we can only speculate, but some things are self-evident. Numbers like 10,000, and
7,000, and 1,000 are round numbers meant as approximations not as precise figures. Yet
Jeremiah 52 is obviously quite precise. Even so, it is unclear as to which groups of “persons”
are being spoken of. The numbers are much too small to indicate the total number who was
deported. No matter, we can get the picture that several thousand were taken, and they were
from the more elite classes, the educators and leadership at all levels. The common people
were left as no doubt they weren’t seen as being at fault, nor were they of any particular value
in Babylon. Besides, they were needed to keep the mines operating, the fields and orchards
producing, construction continuing, and so on. If Babylon emptied the land of the working class
then there would be no source of tribute to draw from Judah.
But with Y’hoyakhin imprisoned Judah now needed a replacement king, and so
Nebuchadnezzar chose Mattaniah, who was Jehoiakhin’s uncle. Nebuchadnezzar (as
customary) gave Mattaniah a new royal name, Tzidkiyahu meaning Yehoveh is righteous.
Notice: Nebuchadnezzar was a smart king and a good politician who had a lot of experience in
holding together a large empire of diverse nations and peoples. So he wisely insisted on not
only keeping a Jewish king on Judah’s throne, but even someone from Josiah’s family
because this was of the Dynasty of David. In other words, he understood that by keeping a
descendant of David’s royal line in power, the people would be more inclined to obey that king
because he was legitimate, and so they were less inclined to make trouble.
Zedekiah, as he is called in English, would be Judah’s last king who was both Jewish and of
the line of David. Why did Nebuchadnezzar choose Zedekiah? Well, for starters, Jehoiakhin
was too young (18 or 19 years old) to have had any sons beyond the age of 2 or 3. Zedekiah
was Josiah’s 3
rd
son, and was probably the last remaining option for Nebuchadnezzar if he
wanted to enthrone a member of Josiah’s family. Unfortunately, Zedekiah was totally unlike
his father; rather Tzidkiyahu was much like all the other wicked kings of Judah, although
perhaps he didn’t work quite so zealously at being wicked. Nonetheless the Lord saw him as
evil.
2Chronciles 36:11-13 CJB

11
Tzedekyah was twenty-one years old when he began his reign, and he ruled for eleven years in
8 / 11

Yerushalayim.
12
He did what was evil from the perspective of ADONAI his God. He did not humble himself before
Yirmeyahu the prophet speaking on behalf of ADONAI.
13
He also rebelled against King N'vukhadnetzar, who had made him swear loyalty to him by God; instead,
he became stiffnecked and hardhearted, refusing to turn to ADONAI the God of Isra'el.
Notice a couple of things about this passage: first, we have a slight variation of
Tzidkiyahu’s name. Here he is called Tzedekyah. Whereas Tzidkiyahu is Yehoveh is
righteous, Tzedekyah is translated as God is righteous. This sort of switching back and forth
from God (yah) to Yehoveh (yahu) in a name was typical of Hebrew custom and literature. But
second, we see that Zedekiah’s main trespass was that he didn’t obey God’s Prophet
Jeremiah. And this was viewed by the Lord as being stiff necked (stubborn), hardhearted (his
mind was closed to God, just as was the Pharaoh of the exodus), and he would not turn to
Yehoveh God of Israel but rather relied on his own ways and his own intellect.
Verse 20 ends this chapter with the notice that it was because the Lord had already decided
the fate of Judah and Jerusalem that Zedekiah rebelled against Babylon. In other words, the
final act that would bring an official end to the Kingdom of Judah just needed someone to carry
it out. So God put it in Zedekiah’s mind to rebel against Nebuchadnezzar. Truly, such a
thought to rebel was irrational. Judah had no means to defeat Babylon. Every time it had been
tried within the past few years, Judah lost more wealth, more people, and more of the Temple
and Palace treasures.
It is an amazing thing that we witness in bible history that not only within God’s Kingdom but
among gentile nations, government leaders often made self-destructive decisions that defied
common sense. We read of them, analyze them, and scratch our heads wondering how a
person could rise to such a lofty position, and yet behave so foolishly. And yet to themselves,
and to those who formed their brain trust, these decisions were brilliant and well-conceived.
And any who questioned them or objected were seen as ignorant; incapable of understanding
life, economics and governing on their elite level. Of course invariably, those leaders (Hebrew
or gentile) who made such decisions had no connection to God. They relied on human wisdom
alone, and either deceived themselves into thinking that they were in good stead with the God
of Israel, or they believed that their own prowess, cunning and intelligence were all that was
needed to rule. It is no different than today, and I can safely say that the end result for the
leaders and their nations of today will be the same as was those ancient ones: national ruin
and estrangement from God.
Let’s move on to the last chapter of 2
nd
Kings.
READ 2
ND
KINGS 25 all

9 / 11

This chapter cuts right to the chase: the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple of God
followed by the final wave of deportations to Babylon. Verse 1 explains that it happened in the
9
th
year of the 11 year reign of Zedekiah. However when it speaks of the 10
th
day of the 10
th
month, it is NOT in reference to how much time Melech Tzidkiyahu (King Zedekiah) had been
on the throne. Rather the 10
th
day of the 10
th
month is giving us a calendar date. The 10
th
month is Tevet (January). It was the dead of winter in Judah; short days, cold, frost would
cover the ground most mornings and without a decent cloak or blanket one could die of
hypothermia overnight. In the higher elevations like Jerusalem, a dusting of snow was common
and expected. A warm fire was a must. The year was 588 B.C.; only 9 years had passed since
the previous failed rebellion attempt. Why would Zedekiah think that now might be a good time,
when all the earlier times ended in disaster? We have to look to Ezekiel to explain his decision,
as obviously doomed to failure and impossible to comprehend as it must have seemed to
everyone in Judah and Babylon…… except, of course, to the mind of the deluded King Zedekiah
who was being enticed by the Lord to go ahead and follow his evil inclination.
Ezekiel 17:11-18 CJB

11
The word of ADONAI came to me:
12
"Say to the rebellious house: 'Don't you know what these things mean?' Tell them: 'Here, the king of
Bavel came to Yerushalayim, took its king and princes and brought them to himself in Bavel.
13
Then he took a member of the royal family and made a covenant with him, putting him under oath. He
removed the powerful leaders of the land,
14
so that this kingdom of his would stay humble and not develop aspirations of its own; rather, it would
keep his covenant and live accordingly.
15
But this man rebelled and sent representatives to Egypt, in order to obtain horses and a sizeable army.
Can he succeed? Can someone who does such things escape punishment? Can he break the covenant
and still escape punishment?
16
"'As I live,' says Adonai ELOHIM, 'in the place where the king who gave him his throne lives, whose
oath he despised and whose covenant he broke, there with him in Bavel I swear that he will die.
17
Pharaoh with his mighty army and numerous troops will give him no help in the war, when they raise
siege-works and build fortified towers to destroy many people;
18
because he despised the oath by breaking the covenant to which he had sworn allegiance; having done
all these things, he will not escape unpunished.'

10 / 11

And here we have it: Zedekiah decided that it would be a great idea to put his hope in an
ancient adversary: Egypt. He tried to make an alliance with Egypt in anticipation that they
would rescue him from Babylon. Oh how often Believers will find themselves in a bad way, and
rather than petition God and wait upon Him in trust, we revert to the ways of the world, to the
former ways that we had supposedly long ago left behind, in order to try and deliver ourselves.
In the bible Egypt has always been representative of a wicked and cruel taskmaster; Satan’s
kingdom, more or less. And yet, like heroin to a drug addict, it seduces even the one who
seems on the road to rehabilitation right back to its degradation and destructive power. But
God has another name for it when we choose the ways of the world over His ways: rebellion.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
11 / 11