JOSHUA
Lesson 12 - Chapter 8

As we continue our lesson in Joshua chapter 8, I’d like to begin by borrowing and
paraphrasing the words of Trent C. Butler, one of the foremost Christian scholars and writers in
our era on the subject of the Old Testament. Trent Butler is a former professor at Baptist
Theological Seminary in Switzerland, and received his PhD. from Vanderbilt. I add that brief
bio because I want to employ the thoughts of this acclaimed conservative, evangelical
academic to help set the tone for our examination of the battle of Ai, the sin of Achan, and the
great God-principles they demonstrate; meant for not only the ancient people of Israel, but also
for the 21st century contemporary Judeo-Christian community.
In parallel with setting the foundation for this morning’s study of Joshua, Professor Butler’s
profound thoughts also go right to the heart of expressing perhaps the primary goal of Torah
Class: to demonstrate once and for all to modern Christians that the entire Bible is alive and
well, and that to turn our backs on any part of it is to deny the divine and eternal nature of its
contents and origin (and we do so at our own peril). It is my fervent hope and desire for us,
together, to boldly and bravely turn back the clock on our beloved Church to recapture the
spirit of the early Body of Messiah. To return to those heady decades immediately following our
Savior’s passion on the cross, to when those very first Believers met, worshipped and studied
in spirit and truth, and put what they learned into practice in faith, purity and simplicity. It is my
longing that we can somehow be released from the burden of weak and tired manmade
doctrines that have been developed over the centuries; doctrines that have served to divide us
into competing denominations and sects, and (equally as sad) designed to separate us from
our elder brothers in the faith, the Jewish people. Instead let us take on the lighter yoke of
God’s Holy Scriptures and the immutable truths and rock-solid principles they command, all at
the direction of our Messiah Yeshua.
Professor Butler says this: “Joshua chapters 7 and 8 play a key role in defining the identity of
the people of God. Here the people of God return to the reality of life (after all the festivity of
their miraculous victory at Jericho), learning now to deal with defeat (at Ai). They learn that
even God’s treasured people face the anger of God when they act in self-confidence, refusing
to look to God for direction or giving Him glory for their victories. The lesson learned by the
fathers (the Patriarchs) had no effect on the sons in the Promised Land; they had to learn
those lessons all over again.
The people of God will not always travel giddy with joy after crossing through the Jordan on
supernaturally dried ground, and marching around a doomed Jericho that stood no chance
against them. Often God’s people find themselves in utter defeat, falling before the Father with
1 / 10

pleas for mercy and renewal.
People of God do not only have problems relating to God, they often have problems relating to
one another. They feel slighted by other groups who are also part of God’s flock. Warfare
among the members of the group (the tribes) can be the result.
Through the agonies of defeat by their enemies and battling among themselves Israel learned
one major lesson. They learned what it meant to be the covenant people of God. Covenant
meant more than simply accepting wonderful promises of the Lord to multiply the nation and
extend her power into the Land of Canaan. It meant more than going through the ritual of
circumcision and the celebration of the yearly festivals. It meant adopting the divinely ordered
lifestyle. It meant making each decision of life in the light of divine leadership, not in the
darkness of personal self-confidence or manmade rules.
It meant that God could, and indeed would, undo the elements of salvation history; but He did it
when He chose to punish His people, not in response to when His people were afraid and so
retreated from hardship and setback.”
What powerful words this learned man, Trent Butler, came to realize and utter after years of
Biblical study and maturation in his faith. I hope many of you were as struck by them as I was.
The battles of Jericho and Ai are but the essential backdrop to the MEANING of Joshua 7 and
8; in these verses Israel, and we, are taught the meaning of life as lived in the light of the divine
presence. Only those who are the covenant people of God can EVER expect that divine
presence in our lives, but they (and now we, Believers) had to learn that the divine presence
was demanding as well as promising. They (and now we) had to learn how to react and
respond to a punishing as well as a merciful God. They (and now we) had to learn that the
divine presence of Yehoveh had greater value than material things that were temporary and
fleeting.
But, thank you Yeshua, they (and now we) also had to learn that God’s anger was not His last
word. He was willing to wait for the people He loves (and who love Him) to seek Him once
again; to lament and then confess to Him, and at last repent and agree with Him. THEN the
wonderful message of redemption and peace with God would again flow and abound among
the people of God.
Let’s re-read the first few verses of Joshua 8.
RE-READ JOSHUA 8:1 – 8
How often in the Bible we read, “do not fear” or “do not be afraid” as a preamble to a
message to Israel from the Lord. Fear is both learned and instinctive. Move a day old infant in
a sudden falling motion and they react in terror even though they had never been dropped.
Make a sudden loud noise that harms no one and I defy any baby, child, or elder not to be
startled or frightened. At the same time, unless taught otherwise, children have little to no fear
2 / 10

of approaching strangers or even going off with them. They will even try to touch a shimmering
hot flame, once. They had not yet learned to fear the evil of men or the dangers of fire.
Most young soldiers, untested, have little fear of battle. Oh they’re nervous, not really knowing
what to expect, but most young men can’t wait to experience it and have a chance to prove
themselves. They are certain that their youth, training, strength, passion and being on the side
of right will give them victory and protection; they don’t see themselves as mortal nor have
they stood next to the stench of death.
It was like that for Israel as they entered Canaan. This was the 2nd generation of the Exodus.
They had not experienced the degradation and servitude of the 1st generation who had lived in
Egypt. They had not fled across the Sinai with Pharaoh’s soldiers nipping at their heals as had
their parents. This group knew only of victory. They had defeated the armies of the Trans-
Jordan. They experienced a miraculous crossing over the Jordan River, not even getting their
toes wet. They knew only of making a procession around the dangerous fortress of Jericho,
and then watching wide-eyed as the city walls fell without even shooting a single arrow in
anger. They saw Joshua as their invincible general, with his brilliant battle strategies, leading
an enormous Israelite army and easily defeating their outclassed Canaanite foes.
But then it happened: Achan had secretly misappropriated some of God’s holy property from
Jericho, Israel became arrogant and self-confident over their resounding victories, and the
Lord’s anger burned at Israel for these sins. The consequence was that the army of Israel was
stung by defeat outside the walls of Ai. NOW they knew fear.
After self-examination, punishment of the guilty party (Achan) thereby satisfying God’s justice,
communal confession and national re-consecration and thus restoration, the Lord ordered
Joshua to again attack Ai. Naturally the formerly fearless troops and their families were afraid
because of what had happened to them just days earlier; so the Lord prefaced His command
to again go to war against Ai by telling the people NOT to despair (not to fear) because, like
Jericho, the LORD had already given Ai over them. All they had to do was to be obedient,
grateful, and do as instructed.
In fact in verse 2 the Lord is even going to allow the soldiers to take the war booty of Ai for
themselves; the Lord has decided NOT to impose the ban upon the livestock and possessions
of this enemy. That is God has determined that He will NOT declare the possessions and
animals belonging to the residents of Ai as His holy property. Why? Although we’re not told, I
believe it revolves around the ending portion of last week’s lesson that spoke of the principle
and pattern of firstfruits. You should refer to that lesson if you want a review or more extensive
explanation; but in brief the idea is that since Jericho was the first of Canaan to be taken (the
firstfruits of the cities of Canaan) the Lord was entitled to ALL of it. Ai being the 2nd city taken
meant that the people of Israel could share in the spoils. We’ll see this principle memorialized
in the requirement that all new vineyards or groves planted in Canaan after Israel’s arrival
were set apart for the Lord until the 5th season. The first 3 seasons were a time of growth and
maturation of the plants and trees, and no picking of fruit was permitted. The 4th season was
the first time the trees were ready to bear a mature crop, but the entire crop was to be devoted
and set aside, given to the Lord (the people got none of it). The 5th season (the 2nd season of
3 / 10

an edible crop) the people could partake of it (getting the majority of the crop for food) although
of course the Lord got His portion first.
Thus the disposition of the spoils of Ai, the 2nd Canaanite city conquered, operated under less
stringent rules for what the people could or could not take for their own as opposed to the total
ban placed on the first city, Jericho, the firstfruits.
Israel was camped in Gilgal, which is about 12 miles or so from Ai. Not taking any chances this
time, Joshua selected 30,000 men that he considered his best troops. They went out in the
night so as to go undetected. Night raids in this era were very rare; and when it did happen, to
a fault it was because the attacking force was smaller than the target. This is a strategy that
we’ll see Israel employ successfully a number of times because it was so unexpected.
The strategy was for the battle to be waged as an ambush. The long and short of it is that the
30,000 men will be divided into two groups. One group (a smaller group) will hide and remain
unknown until the proper moment. Another and larger group will feign a more typical siege
warfare style of frontal attack upon the gates of the city of Ai. When the Canaanite troops on
the walls of Ai see this frontal attack, they will respond. Seeing this the Israeli troops will turn
and run, and then the army of Ai will come out from their barricaded city and chase Israel.
Once they are outside of their stiff defensive position the Canaanites are vulnerable. Joshua
gives the signal and the smaller group of Israel troops will come out of hiding, race into the
emptied city of Ai and take it. Then Israel is to burn it.
Joshua is using the defeat from a few days earlier to his advantage. He surmises that the army
of Ai will expect Israel to do what it did before, turn tail and run when the battle begins. Setting
the city on fire does three things: first it stops the men of Ai from chasing after Joshua so that
they can quickly return to their city and try to save it. Second the smoke tells Joshua that his
men have taken Ai. Third this is the way that the Lord gets His portion; remember, the Lord has
declared that the structures of Ai and the people of Ai are His ban (the peoples livestock and
possessions go to Israel’s troops). They are devoted to God therefore they must be destroyed
and, generally speaking, burned up with fire like a sacrifice on an altar.
RE-READ JOSHUA 8:9 – 17
These verses go to great length to show us that all which God said to do, Joshua and Israel
did. This is as opposed to the first attempt at taking Ai where Joshua and the army relied on
their own ideas and own strength. Let us also not forget that while the earlier attempt did
indeed use a somewhat flawed strategy of using barely enough men to get the job done, the
real reason for the failure was not the strategy but the condition of Israel. Israel was in a state
of sin because of what Achan had done; therefore the Lord turned His face from Israel with a
catastrophic result. Major lesson alert! Sometimes when we seem to be failing and running in
quicksand, it may not be the plan, it may be our relationship with the Lord that is flawed. It may
be that we are striking out on our own, taking the credit for earlier victories instead of giving it
to God, or even operating under the burden of sin that’s the problem. These things must be
remedied FIRST and then it is time to go ahead with plans.
4 / 10

It is in verse 9 that we get a clue as to the actual location of Ai; it is near Beit-el (Bethel in the
more typical English transliteration). Let me comment that scholars do not agree upon the
exact location of Ai. And part of the problem is that the location of Beit-el is also controversial.
The general area is accepted, but there are several possible sites that could be the correct
one. Further, as is the crux of archeology, it’s not that ruins that fit the Biblical descriptions of
Ai and Beit-el haven’t been found (they have) but the time frame of their inhabitation doesn’t
fit according to the dating system used today. In fact this issue of dating is at the heart of what
has caused many archeologists and so-called Bible investigators to declare that many of the
places and events described in the Bible are fairy tales. But it is also a fact that each year
some new discovery is made that exactly corresponds to a Biblical event and so another
Scriptural narrative that had been accused of being mere legend is proved. There is a great
deal of discovery happening as we speak in the City of David (the original Jerusalem) that lies
a few hundred yards down the hill from the Temple Mount. Not only has the original,
enormous, Pool of Siloam just been found, but a large palace structure has also been
unearthed that exactly corresponds to the time of King David. These finds, of course, don’t
deter some academics from continuing to insist that much of the Bible is just a series of tales
with made up places and people.
Ai is most often identified today with a ruin called el-Tel. Beit-el is thought to be at the place
that is today called Beitin. However it may be that Beit-el is not properly located, thus it’s sister
city of Ai would also have to be moved. Anyway, it’s an open question and I really have no
opinion other than if these are NOT the right places, they are certainly very nearby.
Let me also remind you that Ai is Hebrew for ruin. So some archeologists argue that what was
really attacked was called Beit-el and later it came to be called by the name “ruin”, Ai. In fact a
walled and fortified city from the 13th century BC has been found at what is thought to be Beit-
el, and this lends credence to this possibility. Don’t let this throw you. Over time cities were
renamed. Over time cities were destroyed, and then rebuilt very short distances away and then
given the same name. Over time we’ll find multiple cities and places given exactly the same
name, especially because more often than not it was not an attempt to develop a name for a
place, it was simply a description of the place that was being spoken (such as Ai, ruin). So it is
a complex matter and we don’t need to get upset if some scientist casts doubt on the proper
identification of an ancient place. Only occasionally are ancient places ever proven to be what
tradition says they are using the scientific method. After all, they didn’t hang up signs on the
walls of their cities saying, “Welcome to Bethel”.
We begin to get some details about the attack some of which we won’t go into (such as
compass directions). We do find out, though, that Joshua put 5,000 men into hiding for the
ambush, leaving 25,000 to make a show of it as they openly approached the city gates (and
then fleeing) in hopes of drawing the fighting men of Ai out into the open and thus vacating the
city.
In verse 17 we get another reference to this relationship between Ai and Beit-el that puts a lot
of doubt as to the theory of some that they were the same place, just two different names. This
passage indicates that they were two separate cities and they had a close alliance and fought
together as one army. This was very usual and normal for that day just as it is now for a group
5 / 10

of nations to form a military alliance and pledge to fight together if one is attacked. What then
puts the possibility that they were actually one place is that BOTH cities were said to have
completely vacated with the implication that both were taken by Israel. We may never know. By
the way: saying all the people left the city does NOT mean the civilians; it is referring to the
fighting men.
RE-READ JOSHUA 8:18 – 29
Verse 18 makes it clear just who was running this battle; it was the Lord. Although in this age
of Islamic Jihad especially, it is hard for us as peaceful Believers to see the Father as a Divine
Warrior in fact that is exactly how He is portrayed. I have many friends who simply cringe at
this concept and some who use the more typical contemporary evangelical approach that is to
explain that while the God of the Old Testament was indeed a blood thirsty, severe, punishing
God, that the God of the New Testament (Jesus) is meek, mild, loving, and peaceful. I have
little doubt that when the Church of the 2nd century became gentile dominated, it became all
the more difficult for the believing people of that day (who did not share in Israel’s long history)
to reconcile the God of the Torah with the divine Yeshua of Nazareth, even though the Old
Testament was STILL all that existed in the way of Holy writings (it would be another century or
so until ANY of what we now call the New Testament was determined by the gentile church
council to be divinely inspired).
I have one dear friend in particular, a very articulate intelligent gentle soul who avoids the
subject at all cost so bothered is he about it. I don’t want a show of hands, but I suspect many
in this room (and many who are listening on the Internet from all around the globe) struggle
with this aspect of our faith. Thus we have one of the primary reasons that the Christian
Church is so quick and adamant to declare that the Old Testament is dead and gone, nailed to
the cross, that the nature of God has fundamentally changed, and the newest and best
example of Yehoveh is His Son, Yeshua. Well let me throw a little cold water on that concept.
We have seen time and again that Jesus personally declared the Torah to still be alive and
well and that until that day in the future when the current heavens and earth were melted back
into their elements and recreated to form new ones, that not one iota of its principles would be
changed or abolished.
But let me throw one other little reminder at you; our Messiah may have gone out like a lamb
but he’s returning as a lion. This persona of Yeshua as a Messiah who wouldn’t harm a fly,
and thus indicates a new type of God who only has one side (mercy and love), is certainly not
the one depicted in Revelation, is it? When Jesus returns He will come back as (guess what?)
the Divine Warrior of the Old Testament! He will lead the Saints in a literal Holy War to end all
wars; a war called by the Church the Battle of Armageddon. He will be ruthless in eradicating
evil; He will give no quarter and accept no excuses; He will personally slay millions upon
millions of God’s enemy and lead His army of Believers to do the same. All the elements of
the conquest of Canaan will be present once again on this planet, but on an unimaginable
scale. Only instead of the Divine Warrior giving His orders from His heavenly throne (or
perhaps from above the Mercy Seat atop the Ark of the Covenant) through a human general
(Joshua), the Divine Warrior will be present in person in the form of Jesus of Nazareth. We are
6 / 10

told that the blood He will cause to be spilled by His own hand will run the length and breadth
of the Jezreel Valley, as high as the bridle of a horse.
Our Messiah Yeshua is indeed a perfect picture of the Father; if you have seen Yeshua you
have seen the Father, He said. Kind and severe. Demanding and promising. Merciful and
avenging. Prince of peace and Commander of the Lord’s army. The Divine sacrificial lamb and
the Divine Warrior lion. And folks I’m talking only about the NEW Testament!
Verse 18 reminds us of a very similar scene when Moses was still living; Joshua is told by
Yehoveh to point his spear (or possibly, sword) towards Ai as authority and signal for the
destruction of Ai to begin.
Recall Moses using his staff to command the Nile to turn to blood, to itself turn into a serpent,
to order the parting of the Red Sea. Recall how Moses sat on a hilltop overlooking the
Israelites as they battled the Amalekites, holding his staff over his head with the help of two
assistants.
Moses’ staff was the symbol of God’s authority in Moses’ hand. That staff was also used to
set things of God into motion; God’s saving acts and His wrathful acts. Moses was like a
Messiah, a Savior, for Israel. Thus he was a shepherd and of course used a shepherd’s staff
as the symbol of his rule. Joshua on the other hand was a military leader; he was a general, a
fierce warrior. Therefore it was appropriate that the symbol of divine authority placed in
Joshua’s hand was a spear or a sword (a symbol of war). Do you see that? Again we have a
perfect typology not only of Yehoveh the Father, but also of Yeshua the Messiah. Their nature
is both the Shepherd and the Warrior; not one or the other. In His first coming Christ ruled like
a shepherd leader, Moses. In His second coming He will rule like a Warrior King, Joshua, and
Revelation says that Messiah’s rod of authority (his staff, the symbol of his authority) will be a
rod of iron. Unbending, unyielding, hard and not dissuaded.
When Joshua raised his spear at God’s order, instantly the men laying in ambush raced
towards the city, through its gates, and captured it. They set Ai on fire and as the smoke
billowed skyward the men of Ai saw it and knew they had been had. They were caught as in a
vise. Joshua wheeled his army around 180 degrees and charged the now distraught
Canaanites. They could not flee back to the safety of Ai and Beit-el, and so the army of God
set about slaughtering every last enemy soldier. But, as customary, they captured the King of
Ai and brought him before Joshua.
After the Israeli troops had finished with the enemy soldiers they returned to Ai and killed every
last human inhabitant, male and female. These human inhabitants were ban, devoted to God,
holy property, and thus their destruction.
Verse 27 tells us that the only things that escaped destruction were the livestock and the
valuable possessions of the former residents of Ai; these were divided among the soldiers who
participated in the battle.
Verse 29 says that the King of Ai was hanged on a tree until sunset when he was taken down.
7 / 10

He wasn’t given the honor of burial; he was simply discarded at the gates of his ruined city,
and stones piled upon his carcass as a reminder of his demise.
Don’t get a mental picture of a noose around the King’s neck or of crucifixion. Rather “hung
on a pole” means to impale. He was killed and then his body impaled on a pole for all who
passed by to see; the worst sort of ending for royalty. This was custom for that day, as
gruesome as it was.
RE-READ JOSHUA 8:30 – 35
These final verses pose all kinds of problems on the one hand, and on the other they give us
principles that we would do well to pay close attention.
Even the ancient Hebrew sages agree that this episode of Ai, then Mts. Ebal and Gerizim, are
not in chronological order. For one thing, Israel was now based in Gilgal and would be for
some time (Gilgal was around 12 miles or so north of Ai and Beit-el). Ebal and Gerizim were
well to north, at Shechem. It is unimaginable that Israel would have broke camp at Gilgal, went
3 days journey north, had this ceremony then turned around and ventured back to Gilgal. So
exactly when this occurred is up for grabs.
This narrative is the fulfillment of Moses’ instructions to Israel in Deuteronomy 27. Mt. Ebal
and Mt. Gerizim are twin hills with Ebal to the north of Gerizim. On top of Mt. Ebal Joshua had
an altar built, following the instructions that it was to be made of stones not shaped by iron
tools. I told you some weeks back that without doubt some shaping of the stones DID occur,
but not with a metal tool; rather flint knives would have been used.
The ancient Hebrew sages give us a good understanding of the symbolism of using stones
untouched by iron for the altar and I find it quite profound for contained within this symbolism is
the amazing irony that is our God; in His justice system the death of an innocent saves the life
of the guilty. The purpose of an altar was to preserve life (human life) by means of atonement.
The death of an animal provided the blood that would atone for the sins of men who deserved
to have their lives terminated. So for the average person who averts their eyes and thoughts
over the concept on an animal dying and be burned up, they see the altar as a place of death.
Not so, it is a place of life.
Iron is usually symbolic of destruction. Iron is used for weapons. This it would be totally
inappropriate for a tool of iron (a tool of destruction) to be used to form an altar of life.
Even more the altar is the place of attaining peace between the Father and mankind. It is not
fitting that tools used for war would scar such a place. This exact symbolism is brought across
to the well-known proverb that in the Day of the Lord weapons of war will be beaten into
ploughshares. This is speaking of iron implements. And the notion is that iron that has been
used for war and death will be reshaped into an iron implement used to bring forth life from the
earth (crops, food) in peace.
8 / 10

So pay close attention in God’s Word when it speaks of altars and iron, it has deeper meaning
than meets the eye.
In addition to building an altar Joshua has some stone monuments built that has the Word of
God inscribed upon them. Now there is wide disagreement over exactly what portion of the
Torah was written on those stones. Some say it was only the 10 Commandments; others say it
was all of what we call Deuteronomy; still others say it was a kind of summary of the 613 laws.
No one seriously believes that all of Torah was written on these stone slabs.
When the place was readied, the altar built, the stone slabs completed, and Ark of the
Covenant placed there and the priests and Levites in attendance, all Israel including those
foreigners traveling with them stood before these two hills; half facing Ebal and the other half
Gerizim. As instructed by Moses the Torah was read, all of it, including the blessings and the
curses.
What was the point of these final verses of Joshua 8? It was to show that Joshua was indeed
the archetypal Israelite monarch. He did what he was supposed to do, and ruled as he was
supposed to rule. He followed the Torah and ruled from the Torah. He understood that the
basis for his leadership was the Word of God and the power of God and that without it His
leadership was weak if not bogus. It shows Joshua’s great care to be obedient to the Lord,
which is the proper response of a covenant people to the divine covenant the Lord has given
them.
The last verse of this chapter points out something very important for Jews and gentile
Christians to always remember: the Torah is for everyone. It is for the women as well as the
men, it is for the children as it is for the adults, and it is as much for the foreigner, the ger, that
sojourns with Israel as it is for the Hebrew. And it is for everyone to KNOW. Even though it is
tradition among the Orthodox Jews that men and women do not study together, it is fully
expected that the women study Torah as well (women studying with other women). Children
begin studying Torah by the time they are 5 or 6, and they begin with the book of Leviticus (not
the easiest book, is it?)
We could spend more time in Joshua 8 but we need to move on. So let me close with this
thought: in this chapter Israel is taught the real meaning of the command to obey God. It
means to live the divine life style that Torah teaches. But Israel also learns an even deeper
lesson: if and when they’re identity as the people of God is lost, there is a way back and it
begins with self-examination and then confession of wrong doing. From there is repentance
and then a reintroduction to the Word of God. The result is obedience on their part, and
renewal and redemption on the Lord’s part.
Have you walked away from the Lord? Do you have a spouse, or parents, or children who
have fallen away and they are in such danger especially should their lives unexpectedly end?
All is not lost, there is a way back but it is a path not of our design or making; for it is well
defined path, God-ordained and written in the stones of Mt. Ebal. It is the path of self-
examination, confession, repentance, internalizing the Word of God, and obedience. The
result: renewal and redemption.
9 / 10

We’ll start Joshua 9 next week.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
10 / 10